๐Ÿš† Next Stop: Should the Eglinton East LRT Be Built Underground?

With higher ridership potential and longer commutes in Scarborough, questions are growing over whether the Eglinton East LRT should match the underground standard set in Etobicoke.

Eglinton East LRT underground debate showing surface light rail trains operating on a dedicated track in Toronto
Light rail vehicles operate along a dedicated corridor, highlighting the type of surface transit proposed for the Eglinton East LRT in Scarborough. (image source: City of Toronto)

Why the Eglinton East LRT Underground Option Matters for Scarborough

Transit decisions shape how a city moves โ€” and who it prioritizes. In Toronto, that question is once again front and centre as debate grows around the Eglinton East LRT, a long-planned line intended to connect Kennedy Station to Malvern Town Centre.

While the project has cleared environmental approvals, it remains stalled in early design, with no funding commitment or construction timeline. At the same time, the Eglinton Crosstown West extension โ€” serving Etobicoke โ€” is moving forward with significant underground tunnelling mandated by the province.

That contrast is raising an important question:

Should Scarboroughโ€™s transit line be held to the same standard?


A Tale of Two Eglinton Lines

The Eglinton East LRT is not a minor project. At approximately 18.6 kilometres with 27 stops, it is designed to serve some of the most transit-dependent communities in the city, including University of Toronto Scarborough (UTSC) and Centennial College.

Yet despite its scale and importance, the project remains stuck at roughly 10 per cent design.

By comparison, the Eglinton Crosstown West extension โ€” a shorter corridor โ€” is being built with large underground segments, ensuring faster, more reliable service through grade separation.

The difference is not just technical. It is experiential.

Underground transit avoids traffic signals, road congestion, and turning vehicles. It delivers consistent travel times and supports higher capacity. Surface LRT, even in dedicated lanes, often operates with constraints that reduce speed and reliability.


The Equity Question

This is where the debate moves beyond engineering and into equity.

Scarborough residents already face some of the longest commute times in Toronto. Students travelling to UTSC and workers commuting across the eastern part of the city routinely spend hours in transit each day.

If any part of Toronto stands to benefit from faster, fully separated transit, it is this one.

And yet, the current plan for the Eglinton East LRT largely relies on surface-running infrastructure.

If transit equity is the goal, should the communities with the greatest need receive the highest-performing infrastructure?


Learning from Existing LRTs

Toronto already has real-world examples to draw from.

The Eglinton Crosstown (Line 5) demonstrates how underground LRT can function as rapid transit โ€” moving efficiently across long distances with minimal disruption.

Meanwhile, surface LRT systems such as the Finch West LRT highlight the limitations of running in the roadway. While valuable as local transit, these systems operate at lower speeds and are more vulnerable to external delays.

This is not a failure of LRT as a technology โ€” it is a reflection of how it is implemented.


A Provincial Precedent

The Province of Ontario has already shown a willingness to intervene in municipal transit design.

The decision to tunnel significant portions of the Crosstown West extension set a clear precedent: when necessary, project scope can be adjusted to improve long-term performance.

That decision is now part of the broader conversation.

If tunnelling was justified in one corridor, should it be considered in another with equal โ€” or greater โ€” demand?


What Happens Next

At this stage, the Eglinton East LRT is still early enough in its development to allow for meaningful changes.

But those decisions require:

  • Political will
  • Funding alignment across all levels of government
  • And a clear vision for what Scarboroughโ€™s transit future should look like

Because once construction begins, the opportunity to rethink the design disappears.


The Bottom Line

The question is not whether Scarborough deserves better transit โ€” that has already been answered.

The real question is whether Toronto and the province are prepared to deliver it at the same standard seen elsewhere in the city.

After decades of delays, planning studies, and shifting priorities, Scarborough is no longer waiting for promises.

It is waiting for a decision.


๐Ÿš†ย Next Stop is GTA Weeklyโ€™s editorial series on the future of transit across the Greater Toronto Area โ€” tracking the projects, policies, and ideas shaping how we move.

Follow @GTAWeeklyNews for more transit coverage

About Alwin Marshall-Squire 15768 Articles
Alwin Marshall-Squire is the Editor-in-Chief of S-Q Publications Inc., overseeing editorial strategy for GTA Weekly, GTA Today, and Vision Newspaper. He leads the publicationsโ€™ mission to deliver bold, original journalism focused on the people and communities of the Greater Toronto Area, Canada, and the global Caribbean diaspora. Also writes for GTA Weekly and GTA Today.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*